The Division of Occupational Psychology exists to promote the professional interests of occupational psychologists and to support the development of psychology both as a profession and as a body of knowledge and skills.
We support our members by providing training and advice, by holding regular events, and by keeping them up to date with the latest divisional news.
The Excellence in Occupational Psychology Policy Impact Award is an award which recognises Occupational Psychologists and academic psychologists who conduct Occupational Psychology research, and who have affected policy change on a broad scale.
This may include those who have directly or indirectly influenced policy through raising awareness and changing perspectives on a particular issue.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of an academic psychologist who conduct Occupational Psychology practice.
We will be assessing the extent to which nominees have demonstrated policy impact through Occupational Psychology against the following areas.
Nominees may have worked alone or as part of a small team, however awards will not be made to whole organisations.
| Ethics | To what extent does this represent sound ethical principles |
| Influence | To what extent did this work have an impact on society, government, sectors, organisations and/or individuals? To what extent has the nominee challenged existing ideas / practices (e.g. changing the way things are done, changing the conversation)? |
| Science | Quality of evidence base (e.g. theoretical/methodological basis) and/or the nominee’s contribution to developing this |
| Visibility | To what extent have they demonstrated thought leadership across the society (for example in the media, government, organisations etc) |
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award. If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made.
You will need the following information
Nominee information:
| (Q1*) | Nominee name |
| (Q2*) | Nominee BPS number |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q3*) | Nominator name |
| (Q4*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q5*) | Please upload a summary of the area in which the nominee has had an impact (max 1,500 words) |
| (Q6*) | What is the extent of their impact (who has been impacted, how many people / organisations etc)? (max 500 words) |
| (Q7*) | Please describe how they have used Occupational Psychology research and practice to support their work (max 500 words) |
| (Q8*) | Please describe how they have communicated their work across the society (max 500 words) |
| (Q9*) | What ethical priniciples underpin their work? (max 500 words) |
| (Q10) | Please use this space to provide any further information not covered by the above (max 500 words) |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologist, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Friday 18 October 2019
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of the 9 January 2020 at the DOP Annual Conference Awards Dinner in Stratford Upon Avon.
The winner will
The Excellence in Occupational Psychology Practice Award replaces the Practitioner of the Year Award. The award celebrates the work of Occupational Psychologists working as practitioners. We welcome nominations from or on behalf of Occupational Psychologists who have demonstrated excellence in practice.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of a psychologist who conduct Occupational Psychology practice.
Please note
Awards will not be made to whole organisations.
We will be assessing the extent to which the nominee/small collaborative team has demonstrated excellence in Occupational Psychology Practice against the following areas.
| Execution | How well they met the aims of the project (for example whether they challenged the brief provided, innovative solutions), ethical considerations (for example ensuring compentence to practice) |
| Evidence base | Quality of gathered information (in terms of theoretical grounding, methodology, data gathered from stakeholders/practitioners, data gathered from organisation) |
| Impact | To what extent did this work have an impact on individuals, organisations and stakeholders (for example contribution to learning) |
| Visibility | To what extent does this work illustrate the value of Occupational Psychology |
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award.
If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made
You will need to provide the following information on your nomination form:
Nominee information:
| (Q1*) |
Please select one, is the nomination for:
|
| (Q2*) | Nominee/Lead name |
| (Q3*) | Nominee BPS number |
| (Q4*) | Nominee institution |
| (Q5*) | Please tell us the names of all team members involved with this work |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q6*) | Nominator name |
| (Q7*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q8*) | Please provide a summary of the project (max 300 words) |
| (Q9) | Please describe the brief and/or aims of the project (max 500 words) |
| (Q10*) | Please provide details of how you developed the evidence for approach (including theoretical or research basis, methodology, ethics) and how this demonstrates excellence in practice (max 500 words) |
| (Q11*) | Please provide details of how you delivered the project (including overcoming challenges, innovative practice) (max 500 words) |
| (Q12*) |
Please outline the impact on the work (for example benefits for clients, end users, contribution to individual and organisational learning etc) and how you evaluated this (max 500 words) |
| (Q13) | Please provide any additional information you feel may be relevant (max 500 words) |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologist, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Friday 18 October 2019.
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of 9 January 2020 at the DOP Annual Conference Awards Dinner in Stratford Upon Avon.
There will be three short-listed candidates.
All three short listed candidates will:
The winner will be invited to present at the following DOP Annual Conference (2020).
The Excellence in Occupational Psychology Practice (Early Career) Award is a new award which celebrates the work of those who have qualified more recently, including trainees. We welcome nominations from or on behalf of Trainee or recently qualified Occupational Psychologists who have demonstrated excellence in practice.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of a psychologist who conducts Occupational Psychology practice.
Please note the term “active” is intended to exclude any period of career break and is full-time equivalent.
We will be assessing the extent to which nominee/ lead small collaborative team has demonstrated excellence in Occupational Psychology practice against the areas below. As an early career award, it will be evaluated in this context, and it is expected that this work will normally have been completed under supervision or following a period of recent supervision.
| Execution | How well they met the aims of the project (for example whether they challenged the brief, provided innovative solutions), ethical considerations (for example ensuring competence to practice). |
| Evidence base | Quality of gathered information (in terms of theoretical grounding, methodology, data gathered from stakeholders/practitioners, data gathered from organisation) |
| Impact | To what extent did this work have an impact on individuals, organisations and stakeholders (for example contribution to learning or impact on policy) |
| Visibility | To what extent does this work illustrate the value of Occupational Psychology |
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award.
If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made.
Guidance for nominations
You will need to provide the following information on your nomination form
Nominee information:
| (Q1*) |
Please select one, is the nomination for:
|
| (Q2*) | Nominee /Lead name |
| (Q3*) | Nominee BPS number |
| (Q4*) |
Please provide the following details in relation to the Masters or doctoral research
|
| (Q5*) | Please tell us the names of all team members involved with this work |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q6*) | Nominator name |
| (Q7*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q8*) |
Please provide a summary of the project (max 300 words) |
| (Q9) | Please describe the brief and/or aims of the project (max 500 words) |
| (Q10*) | Please provide details of how you developed the evidence for approach (including theoretical or research basis, methodology, ethics) and how this demonstrates excellence in practice (max 500 words) |
| (Q11*) | Please provide details of how you delivered the project (including overcoming challenges, innovative practice) (max 500 words) |
| (Q12*) | Please outline the impact on the work (for example benefits for clients, end users, contribution to individual and organisational learning etc) and how you evaluated this (max 500 words) |
| (Q13*) | Please provide details of supervision / how you ensured competence to practice (max 500 words) |
| (Q14*) | Please provide any additional information you feel may be relevant (max 500 words) |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologist, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Friday 18 October 2019.
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of the 9 January 2020 at the DOP Annual Conference Awards Dinner in Stratford Upon Avon.
The winner will
The Excellence in Occupational Psychology Research Award replaces our previous "Academic Contribution to Practice Award". We would like to welcome nominations for exceptional research which has had a significant impact, for example further research, practice and policy.
Please note that those within five years of their Masters/PhD should consider the Excellence in Occupational Psychology Research (Early Career) Award.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of an academic psychologist who conduct Occupational Psychology research.
Please note: Awards will not be made to whole organisations.
We would like to welcome nominations for exceptional research which has has a significant impact in various ways, for example further research, practice and policy.
| Competence | To what extent has this person's work demonstrated excellence in research methodology (For example using innovative techinques) |
| Influence | To what extent has this person's research devleloped knowledge, practice and/or policy |
| Science | To what extent has this person produced robust, quality research? (For example gaining quality samples, replicable results, addressing real world problems etc) |
| Visibility | To what extent has this person disseminated their work to those within the field and outside of this (for example publishing record, conference or public presentations, media appearance) |
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award.
If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made.
You will need to fill in the nomination form describing the Nominees research AND submit a paper (either published, submitted, under review or a draft in which the nominee is First Author) that demonstrates the exceptional research undertaken by the Nominee.
Nominee information:
| (Q1*) |
Please select one, is the nomination for
|
| (Q2*) | Nominee/Lead name |
| (Q3*) | Nominee BPS number |
| (Q4*) | Nominee institution |
| (Q5*) | Please tell us the names of all team members involved with this work |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q6*) | Nominator name |
| (Q7*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q8*) | Please provide an overview of the research undertaken (including scope, topics etc) (max 300 words) |
| (Q9*) | Please provide details to demonstrate excellence in the research (including ethical implications and how the quality in the research process was ensured) (max 300 words) |
| (Q10*) | Please provide details of how the theoretical , methodolical and practical impact of the research and how this has been established (max 300 words) |
| (Q11*) | Please provide details of how the research was disseminated both within OP and beyond (max 300 words) |
| (Q12*) | Please provide details on the primary role of the nominee/lead in an academic institution or details if the nominee\lead has retired from such role (max 300 words) |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologist, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Tuesday the 30 October 2018 and the winner will be notified by Friday 16 November 2018.
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of the 10 January 2019 at the Division of Occupational Psychology Annual Conference Gala Dinner in Chester.
The winner will
The Excellence in Occupational Psychology Research (Early Career) Award is a recent award which celebrates the work of those who have qualified more recently.We would like to welcome nominations for exceptional research which has had an impact in various ways, for example further research, practice and policy.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of a psychologist who conduct Occupational Psychology research.
Please note
We will be assessing the extent to which nominees have demonstrated excellence in Occupational Psychology Research against the following areas.As an early career award, it will be evaluated in this context, and it is expected that this work will normally have been completed under supervision or following a period of recent supervision.
| Competence | To what extent has this person's work demonstrated excellence in research methodology(For example using innovative techinques) |
| Influence | To what extent has this person's research devleloped knowledge, practice and/or policy |
| Science | To what extent has this person produced robust, quality research? (For example gaining quality samples, replicable results, addressing real world problems etc) |
| Visibility | To what extent has this person disseminated their work to those within the field and outside of this (for example publishing record, conference or public presentations, media appearance) |
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award.
If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made.
You will need to complete the nomination form describing the Nominees research AND submit a paper (either published, submitted, under review or a draft in which the Nominee is First Author)
that demonstrates the exceptional rresearch undertaken by the Nominee.Nominee information:
| (Q1*) |
Please select one, is the nomination for
|
| (Q2*) | Nominee/Lead name |
| (Q3*) | Nominee BPS number |
| (Q4*) | Nominee institution |
| (Q5*) | Please provide details on the primary role of the nominee/lead in an academic institution or details if the nominee\lead has retired from such role (max 300 words) |
| (Q6*) |
Please provide the following details in relation to the Masters or doctoral research
|
| (Q7*) |
Please tell us the names of all team members (for example the names of the supervisor/s) involved in your main research project and their contribution to the research project. |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q8*) | Nominator name |
| (Q9*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q10*) | Please provide an overview of the research undertaken (including scope, topics etc) (max 300 words) |
| (Q11*) | Please provide details to demonstrate excellence in the research (including ethical implications and how the quality in the research process was ensured) (max 300 words) |
| (Q12*) |
Please provide details of the theoretical and/or methodological of the research and how this has been established (max 300 words) |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologist, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Tuesday the 30 October 2018 and the winner will be notified by Friday 16 November 2018.
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening 10 January 2019 at the Division of Occupational Psychology Annual Conference Gala Dinner in Chester.
The winner will
The Lifetime Contribution to Occupational Psychology Award replaces the Lifetime Achievement Award. We welcome nominations on behalf of Occupational Psychologists andacademic psychologists who conduct Occupational Psychology research and who have made an outstanding and sustained contribution professionally.This might be through work which has had a significant impact on the public, in developing our understanding of psychology in work contexts or susstantial contribution to the Division or former Section of Occupational Psychology.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of DOP members. Where self-nominations are made, we require a supporting nominator.
We will be assessing the extent to which the nominee/small collaborative team have made an outstanding and sustained contribution professionally in the following areas which relate to our Strategic Plan. They may have demonstrated leadership in professional Society roles or within an academic or practice setting. Their impact may have been within the profession or across society and in government.
The following are examples of contexts in which you may have made a substantial contribution. These are not intended to be exhaustive or restrictive.
| Competence | To what extent has this person's work ensured that new and existing members of the profession have the required skill sets to function effectively in their roles/ensured standards of practice fo those using OP methods |
| Employability | To what extent has this person promoted opportunities for the employment of occupational psychologists within diverse organisations |
| Influence | To what extent has this person impacted guidance and insight for policy makers, organisations, individuals, and stakeholders when making policy decisions that is informed by occupational psychology |
| Science | To what extent has this person advanced knowledge or practice? |
You will need the following information:
Nominee information
| (Q1*) | Nominee name |
| (Q2*) | Nominee BPS number |
| (Q3*) | Please provide details on how the nominee/lead has achieved an advanced stage in their career or details if the nominee\lead has retired from such role (max 300 words) |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q4*) | Nominator name |
| (Q5*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q6*) | Please provide an overview of the contexts which has made an outstanding contribution (max 300 words) |
| (Q7*) | Please provide details of what was done/achieved to make an outstanding contribution (max 300 words) |
| (Q8*) | Please provide an explanation of the impact of the work (max 300 words) |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologist, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Friday 18 October 2019 and the winner will be notified by Friday 16 November 2019
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of the 9 January 2020 at the Division's Annual Conference Awards Dinner in Stratford Upon Avon.
The winner will
The DOP is volunteer-led and this means that many of our members have donated considerable time and energy to developing our profession.
We would like to recognise those who have made a significant active contribution over a number of years to the Division or previous Section. This award replaces Long Term Active Service Award.
Only third-party nominations will be accepted.
Please note that this is not a competitive award, however nominees must meet certain criteria for the award to be made.
We will be assessing the degree to which the nominee has provided an active contribution over an extended period of service.
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award.
If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made.
Criterion 1 Leading in a voluntary context (see Leadership Capabilities Framework)A rating of 7 would require the nominee to demonstrate leadership capabilities in a voluntary context including:• Empowering and Engaging• Communicating with Others• Collaborating with Others• Cultivating Relationships• Strategic Direction• Driving Improvements• Understanding the Division and Wider Context• Managing Oneself (including meeting deadlines) NB These qualities may be demonstrated in team roles as well as in designated leadership positions.
Criterion 2 Scale of contributionA rating of 7 would require the nominee to have made a significant voluntary contribution over at least 8 years (not necessarily continuous):Examples include:• Sustaining a high level of volunteer activity • Implementing a new initiative• Developing/Implementing standards/qualifications• Convening a working group or subcommittee• Contributing to DOP policy/publications• Taking-on a range of different roles over the years• Making a substantial time commitment to volunteering• Contributing above and beyond normal requirements of the role
Criterion 3 Advancement of Profession (Breadth and Depth)A rating of 7 would require the nominee to have made a significant contribution as a volunteer to advancement of the profession.• Influencing the development of the profession through publication, representation at conferences/the media etc.• Representing/influencing the development of the profession across divisional boundaries• Encouraging / facilitating debate on professional issues
You will need the following information to complete a nomination form.
Nominee information:
| (Q1*) | Nominee name |
| (Q2*) | Nominee BPS number |
| (Q3*) | Nominee institution |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q4*) | Nominator name |
| (Q5*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q6*) | Please upload details of the nominee's volunteer roles in the DOP, including dates where possible. If you require assistance with this information please email [email protected] quoting 'DOP Long Term Active Service Award' in the subject line (max 1,000 words) |
| (Q7*) | Please upload an outline of their activity and contributions as a volunteer for the Division and why their achievements should be recognised (max 1,000 words) |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologists, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Friday 18 October 2019 and the winner will be notified by ???????.
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of Thursday 9 January 2019 at the Divisions Annual Conference Awards dinner in Stratford Upon Avon.
The winner will
The Student Prizes for Excellence in Occupational Psychology recognise undergraduate, postgraduate and doctorale projects that have made a valuable contribution and/or potential real world impact to the field of occupational psychology.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of students who conduct Occupational Psychology practice.
| Competence | To what extent has this person’s work demonstrated excellence in research methodology (for example using innovative techniques) |
| Influence | To what extent has this person’s research contributed to knowledge, practice or policy |
| Science | To what extent has this person produced quality research? (for example gaining quality samples, addressing real worldproblems etc) |
| Visibility | To what extent has this person’s research demonstrated the value of Occupational Psychology? |
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award.
If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made.
Criterion 1: Science
To what extent has the nominee produced quality research?
A rating of 7 would require the nominee to have produced research with an exceptionally high standard of relevance and scientific rigour, for example:
Criterion 2:Competence
To what extent has the nominees work demonstrated excellence in research methodology
A rating of 7 would require the nominee to have demonstrated high standards of competence in their research, for example:
Criterion 3: Influence
To what extent has the nominees research contributed to knowledge, practice or policy
A rating of 7 would require the nominee to have made a significant contribution to breadth and depth of OP research or practice, for example:
Criterion 4: Visibility
To what extent has the nominees research demonstrate the value of Occupational Psychology?
A rating of 7 would require the nominee to have made exceptional efforts to communicate their work, for example by:
You will need the following information to complete a nomination form
Nominee information:
| (Q1*) | Nominee name |
| (Q2*) | Nominee BPS number |
| (Q3*) | Nominee institution |
| (Q4*) | Nominee course title |
| (Q5*) |
Please select one,
|
| (Q6*) | When did you graduate? |
| (Q7*) |
Please upload proof of degree (BA/BSc, Msc, PhD) |
Nominator information (if applicable):
| (Q8*) | Nominator name |
| (Q9*) | Nominator institution |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q10*) | Project Supervisor name |
| (Q11*) | Project Supervisor position / title |
| (Q12*) | Project Supervisor academic institution |
| (Q13*) | Project Supervisor email address |
| (Q14*) |
Please provide details of:
|
| (Q15*) |
Please upload the project information (max 2,000 words) Project information should cover the following areas
Please provide any additional information you feel may be relevant. |
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologists, academics and representatives from our partners.
Nominations will close on Friday 18 October 2019 and the winner will be notified by ?????????
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of the 9 Janaury 2020 at the Divisions Annual Conference Awards Dinner in Stratford Upon Avon.
The winner will
The Division of Occupational Psychology are delighted to announce that our awards will now be judged by a mix of representatives from the committee, well-known voices in the profession and our professional partners outside of Occupational Psychology.
We are delighted to announce that the following distinguished members will be joining us on the judging panel:
These members join our DOP volunteers, who will also be part of our judging panel:
We are grateful to our judges for donating their time to recognising excellence in our profession.
We will be making further announcements about our judges in the forthcoming weeks, so please check back for further information.
The Excellence in Occupational Psychology Practice Team Award is a new award which celebrates the work of occupational psychology in a team/organisational setting. We would like to welcome nominations where teams have worked together to make an exceptional contribution to delivering excellence in applying the practical value of the science and psychology of work in organisational settings. Together with how they have demonstrated collaboration to achieve success, this may be the work of a multi-disciplinary or occupational psychology team.
Nominations can be made either by or on behalf of a team who apply Occupational Psychology practice.
Nominator can be anyone
We will be assessing the extent to which the team has demonstrated excellence in Occupational Psychology practice against the below areas.
| Execution | How well they met the aims of the project (for example whether they challenged the brief, provided innovative solutions), ethical considerations (for example ensuring competence to practice). |
| Evidence Base | Quality of gathered information (in terms of theoretical grounding, methodology, data gathered from stakeholders / practitioners, data gathered from organisation). |
| Impact | To what extent did this work have an impact on individuals, organisations and stakeholders (for example contribution to learning or impact on policy, health and well-being or diversity ). |
| Visibility | To what extent does this work illustrate the added value of Occupational Psychology |
Each will be rated on a scale from 1-7 and a minimum of 16 points must be achieved in order to receive the award. An arithmetic scoring method will be used and the winning team selected on merit order.
If no submissions of sufficient merit are received, no award will be made.
As this is a new award, the criteria are currently being designed and will be published shortly. Guidance for nominationsYou will need to provide the following information on your application form:
| (Q1*) |
Please select if the nomination is for:
|
| (Q2*) | Nominee /Lead name |
| (Q3*) | Nominee/Lead name BPS number |
| (Q4*) | Please tell us the names of all team members involved with this work |
Nominator Information (if applicable):
| (Q6*) | Nominator name |
| (Q7*) | Nominator institution/organisation |
| You will also be asked to provide information in relation to the following questions: | |
| (Q8*) | Please provide a summary of the project (max 300 words) |
| (Q9) | Please describe the brief and/or aims of the project/piece of work (max 500 words) |
| (Q10*) | Please provide details of how the team developed the evidence for approach (including theoretical or research basis, methodology, ethics) and how this demonstrates excellence in practice (max 500 words) |
| (Q11*) | Please provide details of how the team delivered the project (including overcoming challenges, innovative practice) (max 500 words) |
| (Q12*) | Please outline the impact on the work (for example benefits for clients, end users, contribution to individual and organisational learning etc) and how you evaluated this (max 500 words) |
| (Q13*) | Please provide details of supervision / how you ensured competence to practice (max 500 words) |
| (Q14*) | Please provide any additional information you feel may be relevant (max 500 words) |
• Submit an application
Awards will be judged by a panel of Occupational Psychologists, academics and representatives from our partners. Nominations will close on Friday 18th October 2019.
The presentation ceremony will be held on the evening of the 10th January 2020 at the Division of Occupational Psychology Annual Conference Gala Dinner Stratford Upon Avon. The winning team will:
Student Prizes for Excellence in Occupational Psychology (Head Judge – Dr Richard Kwiatkowski):
Winner - 1st place, Emily Kitson, 2nd place, Thomas Harding
Excellence in Occupational Psychology Practice Early Career (Head Judge – Julie Freeborn):
Winner - Hoda Hussein
Excellence in Occupational Psychology Research Early Career (Head Judge – Dr Angela Carter):
Winner - Dr Victoria Elsey
Excellence in Occupational Psychology Practice (Head Judge – Binna Kandola):
Winner - Sophie Seex
Shortlisted - Gail Steptoe-Warren, Professor Fiona Patterson
Excellence in Occupational Psychology Research (Head Judge – Professor Rob Briner):
Winner - Dr Claire Hardy
Excellence in Occupational Psychology Policy Impact (Head Judge – Nick Pahl):
Winner - Dr Nancy Doyle
Long-term Active Service (Head Judge – Nicola Gale):
Winner - Kisane Prutton
| 2017 | Jonathan Passmore |
| 2016 | Dr Rachel Travers |
| 2015 | Professor David Guest |
| 2014 | Professor Rob Briner |
| 2013 | Professor Fiona Patterson |
| 2011 | Adrian Furnham |
| 2017 | No Award |
| 2016 | Professor Victor Dulowicz |
| 2015 | Dr David Bartram |
| 2014 | Chris Lewis |
| 2013 | Professor Clive Fletcher |
| 2012 | Pat Lindley |
| 2011 | John Toplis |
| 2017 | Antonia Dietman |
| 2016 | Dr Balissa Greene |
| 2015 | Hannah Markson (nee Walker) |
| 2014 | Kate Firth |
| 2012 | Kate Bonsall-Clarke |
| 2011 | Laura Empey |
| 2013 | Nancy Doyle |
| 2011 | Vicki Ashworth |
| 2017 | No Award |
| 2016 |
Kathryn Pimblett Nicola Paget Rachel Driver |
| 2015 |
Emma Donaldson-Fielder Julie Jebson Rachel Lewis |
| 2017 | No Award |
| 2016 |
Dr Almuth McDowell Dr Gail Kinman Jonathan Cox |
| 2015 | Dr Almuth McDowall |
| 2013 | Emma Donaldson-Fielder |